Opinion piece – whisky 100 points system 1
The whisky review scene is regularly abuzz with discussions on the value of the classic 100-point rating system which is so widely used amongst whisky reviewers. Should you wish to catch up on the debate, the best place to go would probably be the relatively recent ‘round table’ discussion over at the Jewish Single Malt Whisky Society, where 12 prominent whisky bloggers have shared their views.
I didn’t originally intend to share my own view of the system, but having read so many articles about it of late I couldn’t resist joining in on the fun. As you may have noticed, I do not (unlike four – correct me if I’m wrong – of the honourable knights of the whisky round table) myself use a rating system, and this wee post shall explain why. While I see the point (please don’t interpret that as a pun) in them, I don’t think they could ever work – at least not in a blog setting. You see, everyone likes different types of whiskies; some of us will prefer the sweet and loving embrace of a Dalmore 12, while others will prefer the peaty smoke of an Ardbeg 10.
Now, I think they are both absolutely outstanding whiskies in their price range and I do hold them both dear, but as regular readers of this blog may have noticed, I do have a preference for a sweeter whisky. In other words, though I fully appreciate both of the above expressions and think they are – if I am to be neutral – each other’s equal in every respect, I would have to score Dalmore higher because it appeals slightly more to my pallet. Hypothetically (and don’t read in to these scores, they are quite arbitrary) I would give Dalmore 90 and Ardbeg 85 – this would, I think, reflect the fact that I think both are outstanding whiskies (thus a score over 80) yet I do have a preference for Dalmore, simply because of my incurable sweet tooth.
Some might think that unfair – why should Dalmore get 5 points more than Ardbeg when I’ve just said that they are both each other’s equal in every way? Shouldn’t they both get 85? 90? Or perhaps 87.5? You would be absolutely right to say that, because if they are pretty much exactly as good as each other. But then, what would the point be in my trying to be neutral? This blog is supposed to reflect my opinion, after all, as that is all I could possibly give. Whichever way you go around it, you will end up with an unfair score. And that’s without even going in to the incredibly difficult area of bang for buck – is a Dalmore King Alexander the III, at over £100, really only 2 points better than Dalmore 12, at £35? Should they even be rated on the same scale?
In my opinion, the best information you can share is the flavours, textures, and smells you experience. I gain far more insight into a whisky by reading that this and that reviewer have both picked up a banana note on the palate – which I can then try to find myself, which is always interesting – than I do from a score of 85 here and 87 there.
